Letters,
Education Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jun. 20, 2019
Universities cannot shortcut the due process rights of those accused of sexual misconduct
In the June 12 edition of the Daily Journal, David Urban wrote an article regarding Austin v. University of Oregon, 2019 DJDAR 4815 (9th Cir. June 4, 2019), arguing that the case’s “reasoning will be relevant in California because it expressly interprets federal standards for due process in the student discipline context.”
Timothy D. Reuben
Founder and CEO
Reuben, Raucher & Blum
Phone: (310) 777-1990
Email: treuben@rrbattorneys.com
Reuben is the founder and CEO at Reuben Raucher & Blum. Alongside his extensive career as a civil litigator specializing in complex matters at both the trial and appellate level, he serves pro bono as a temporary judge and settlement officer for the Los Angeles Superior Court, as well as a fee arbitrator for the LA County Bar.
In the June 12 edition of the Daily Journal, David Urban wrote an article regarding Austin v. University of Oregon, 2019 DJDAR 4815 (9th Cir. June 4, 2019), arguing that the case's "reasoning will be relevant in California because it expressly i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In