Civil Rights,
California Supreme Court
Sep. 18, 2019
California Supreme Court's moderate approach to arbitration continues
The picture painted by defense counsel of recent Supreme Court's decisions in the area of mandatory arbitration is typically one of unrestrained antipathy for the device, accompanied by dire concern and even more dire predictions of clashes with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Glenn A. Danas
Partner
Clarkson Law Firm P.C.
Employment; Class Action Litigation; Appellate Advocacy
Phone: (213) 788-4050
Email: gdanas@clarksonlawfirm.com
Emory Univ SOL; Atlanta GA
Glenn focuses on appeals and major motions, and has substantial experience litigating consumer and employment class actions. Mr. Danas was named one of the Top 100 Attorneys in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal, and received a California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) award in 2015 for his work on Iskanian
The picture painted by defense counsel of the California Supreme Court's decisions in the area of mandatory arbitration is typically one of unrestrained antipathy for the device, accompanied by dire concern and even more dire predictions of clashes with the U.S. Supreme Court. See, e.g., Anthony J. Oncidi , "Arbitration Wars: A report from the front," Daily Journal, Sept. 10, 2019 (suggesting that the U.S. Suprem...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In