Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Sep. 24, 2019
Anti-SLAPP: The catchall that caught too much
In three recent decisions, the California Supreme Court appears to have launched a campaign to curb the broad application of CCP Section 425.16(e)(4).
Jason D. Russell
Partner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Litigation
300 S Grand Ave, Suite 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5000
Fax: (213) 687-5600
Email: jason.russell@skadden.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Hillary A. Hamilton
Associate
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
300 S Grand Ave #3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5576
Fax: (213) 687-5600
Email: Hillary.hamilton@skadden.com
Univ of Virginia School of Law
Adam K. Lloyd
Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Email: adam.lloyd@skadden.com
UCLA SOL; Los Angeles CA
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16 permits meritless claims in a strategic lawsuit against public participation (aka "SLAPP") to be stricken when based on "act[s] in furtherance" of constitutional rights of freedom of spee...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In