This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
Criminal,
California Supreme Court

Oct. 28, 2019

State high court de-publishes reversal of attorney’s conviction

The state Supreme Court de-published three opinions last week, including the reversal of an attorney’s criminal conviction that concluded civil litigation privilege can be a defense in an extortion case.

The state Supreme Court de-published three appellate court opinions last week, including the reversal of an attorney's criminal conviction that concluded civil litigation privilege can be a defense in an extortion case.

The high court declined to hear the matter, People v. Toledano, but de-published the opinion of the 4th District Court of Appeal, which reversed Orange County lawyer James Toledano's conv...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up