Civil Litigation,
Government
Nov. 1, 2019
Plaintiff files 8 motions to beat coffee makers’ use of state regulation as defense
The plaintiff suing in the nearly decade-long Proposition 65 coffee labeling case filed a number of motions this week hoping to beat back defendants’ use of a new state regulation that states coffee is not hazardous to drinkers.
The plaintiff suing in the nearly decade-long Proposition 65 coffee labeling case filed eight motions for summary adjudication this week hoping to beat back defendants' use of a new state regulation that states coffee is not hazardous to drinkers.
The motions filed by Raphael Metzger of Long Beach on behalf of the Council for the Education and Research on Toxics, come after Los Angeles county Superior Court Judge $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
