U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Nov. 5, 2019
Riverside property owner sues county in federal court, citing new U.S. Supreme Court decision
Riverside County has asked a federal judge to dismiss one of the first inverse condemnation suits filed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Knick v. Township of Scott that a property owners, claiming the government took their land without paying for it, can sue local governments in the plaintiff’s preferred federal venue.
Riverside County has asked a federal judge to dismiss one of the first inverse condemnation suits filed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Knick v. Township of Scott that property owners, claiming the government took their land without paying for it, could sue local governments in the plaintiff's preferred federal venue.
"This is really asking the federal district court judge to decide does Knick ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Knick v. Township of Scott
State-litigation requirement under 'Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City' imposes an unjustifiable burden on takings plaintiffs, conflicts with the ...
