This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Constitutional Law

Nov. 22, 2019

California constitutional claims removed to defeat state’s legal challenges

Plaintiffs challenging the constitutional validity of Assembly Bill 1054 are seeking to amend their complaint proceeding on claims for federal unlawful takings to challenge the state’s defense citing 11th amendment sovereign immunity.

Trying to thwart the state's sovereign immunity defense, plaintiffs challenging a controversial wildfire funding bill are invoking federal violations only of the U.S. Constitution's takings clause, contending customers were wrongly imposed a rate increase to support the fund.

Michael J. Aguirre and Maria C. Severson of San Diego-based Aguirre Severson LLP sued Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California Public Utilities Commission and several...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up