This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Litigation,
Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Nov. 25, 2019

State high court asked to decide if Dynamex applies retroactively

The California Supreme Court has agreed to hear Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, a case the 9th Circuit initially ruled on in May before retracting its decision a few months later.

In granting certification, the California Supreme Court will answer one of the remaining questions on misclassification stemming from the 2018 Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court decision: Should it apply retroactively in all labor disputes?

In an order published last week, the state high court agreed to hear ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up