Six months after being disqualified from representing Woolsey Fire claimants, a former longtime utility defender is seeking to reverse the order, arguing it was based on a lack of substantial evidence that he received any confidential information he could use to his advantage litigating against Southern California Edison Co. when he pitched to represent them in another fire case.
Kenneth R. Chiate, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In