Labor/Employment
Jan. 8, 2020
State high court to decide if PAGA plaintiff loses standing
The evolving Private Attorneys General Act and its effects on employment disputes continued Tuesday in the California Supreme Court as attorneys sparred over whether a named plaintiff loses standing in a PAGA claim if their individual arbitration has been settled and dismissed with prejudice.
The evolving Private Attorneys General Act and its effects on employment disputes continued Tuesday in the California Supreme Court as attorneys sparred over whether a named plaintiff loses standing in a PAGA claim if their individual arbitration has been settled and dismissed with prejudice.
Both the trial court and the 2nd District Court of Appeal agreed plaintiff Justin Kim was no longer "an aggrieved employee" after settling his ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Employment Law
Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC
Arbitration agreement that compels waiver of representative actions under Private Attorneys General Act is unenforceable as a matter of public policy.
Labor Law
Kim v. Reins International California, Inc.
Order granting summary adjudication on PAGA claim for lack of standing affirmed where plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses individual claims is not aggrieved employee under PAGA.