This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Constitutional Law

Jan. 27, 2020

US suit over California private prisons law could be first impression case

However, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of UC Berkeley School of Law, said, “There is no express preemption provision. As for implied preemption, there is no conflict between federal law and state law.

The U.S. government’s suit to halt enforcement of a new law that phases out the use of private prisons in California could be a case of first impression on the issue of preemption, or have no effect at all, according to reactions from attorneys.

Several government agencies stated in the complaint filed Friday in federal court in San Diego the new law would cripple their operations.

Seeking a jud...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up