California Courts of Appeal
Feb. 25, 2020
3rd District panel asks: ‘Does silence equal consent’
This seemingly philosophical question was at the heart of a years-old drunk driving case argued before the 3rd District Court of Appeal on Monday.
SACRAMENTO -- Does silence equal consent? This seemingly philosophical question was at the heart of a years-old drunk driving case argued before the 3rd District Court of Appeal on Monday.
Corrina Bodenmann was pulled over by a California Highway Patrol officer in Yolo County. She refused a Breathalyzer test, was arrested, and was subsequently found to be intoxicated through a blood test. Bodenmann did not ultimately resist the bloo...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Government
Facing dissolution, redevelopment agencies plead for more time
By Ben Adlin
Criminal Law and Procedure
Espinoza v. Shiomoto
SCOTUS decision in 'McNeely' does not grant drivers arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence right to demand blood test requiring warrant to determine BAC.
Administrative Agencies
Garcia v. DMV
Defendant’s driver’s license is properly suspended after refusal to submit to chemical test following arrest for driving under influence of alcohol.
