This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Apr. 14, 2020

Arbitration feud escalates between Postmates and couriers

The couriers’ attorneys “could have filed arbitration demands promptly upon being retained, rather than strategically waiting to file any demands before amassing enough clients to file thousands at once to exert maximum settlement pressure,” Postmates’ attorneys said in court documents.

Attorneys who filed arbitration demands against Postmates on behalf of more than 10,000 couriers are not actually interested in "obtaining prompt arbitration of their claims," Postmates said in court filings, which addressed the company's request for a temporary restraining order against the mass action.

Postmates filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order last week, after Judge Philip S. Gutierrez of the Cen...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up