This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Apr. 27, 2020

US magistrate judge indicates Uber must face antitrust suit

Despite Lyft’s presence in the market, U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero found Friday Uber has enough drivers and riders to potentially charge monopoly prices without surrendering its substantial market share and indicated the company’s defense the market is actually an oligopoly is not enough to dismiss the claims.

SAN FRANCISCO -- Uber will likely not be able to avoid an antitrust lawsuit alleging it enjoys the power to dramatically raise prices for riders in the absence of competitors able to respond by undercutting the ride-hailing giant, a U.S. magistrate in San Francisco signaled Friday.

Despite Lyft's presence in the market, U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero found Uber h...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up