This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Apr. 30, 2020

Conservatives on 9th Circuit highlight ‘takings’ case for high court

A contingent of conservative judges objected to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ Wednesday decision not to reconsider a lawsuit they say allows a state agency to take property from agricultural landlowners so union organizers can contact farm laborers.

Conservatives on 9th Circuit highlight ‘takings’ case for high court
Judge Richard A. Paez

A contingent of conservative judges objected to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' Wednesday decision not to reconsider a lawsuit they say allows a state agency to take property from agricultural landlowners so union organizers can contact farm laborers.

The pointed dissent by Judge Sandra S. Ikuta, joined by seven other 9th Circuit judges appointed by Republican p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up