This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Antitrust & Trade Reg.

May 5, 2020

Uber must answer antitrust lawsuit by now-defunct rival

Uber Technologies Inc. must answer an antitrust lawsuit claiming its predatory pricing and other anticompetitive practices drove a now-defunct rival out of business, a U.S. magistrate judge in San Francisco ruled.

Uber Technologies Inc. must answer an antitrust lawsuit claiming its predatory pricing and other anticompetitive practices drove a now-defunct rival out of business, a U.S. magistrate judge in San Francisco ruled.

Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero found Uber cannot escape allegations from SC Innovations Inc., successor to ride-hailing pioneer Sidecar Techonologies I...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up