This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

May 20, 2020

Consolidation of business interruption cases decried by many plaintiffs’ and defense attorneys

Policyholders and insurance companies often disagree. But at least on a procedural level, many attorneys representing them agree that consolidating lawsuits over novel business interruption coverage related to the coronavirus is not the way to go.

Policyholders and insurance companies often disagree. But at least on a procedural level, many attorneys representing them said consolidating lawsuits over business interruption coverage related to the coronavirus is not the way to go.

Since a rash of lawsuits have poured into state and federal courts in California and across the nation, petitions for courts to adjudicate a novel issue under one umbrella in state court or a federal ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up