When a rural couple was asked by a law enforcement official to check on a neighbor who made a 911 call and were attacked when they stumbled upon a double homicide, were they engaged in active law enforcement and limited to workers' compensation for their injuries?
That was the question the state Supreme Court considered o Tuesday in the case of Gund et al., v. County of Trinity et al., S249792.
...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In