Labor/Employment,
Civil Litigation
Jun. 22, 2020
Uber Eats is latest target of worker classification suit
Rideshare industry foe Shannon Liss-Riordan is continuing her crusade for a court order forcing certain companies that lawmakers and regulators say are openly defying state labor law to classify workers as full-fledged employees, this time in a purported class action against Uber Eats.
Rideshare industry foe Shannon Liss-Riordan is continuing her crusade for a court order forcing certain companies that lawmakers and regulators say are openly defying state labor law to classify workers as full-fledged employees, this time in a purported class action against Uber Eats.
Liss-Riordan has filed other lawsuits against Uber and Lyft in federal court in San Francisco, one of which might be the first in the nation to get to...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor/Employment
State and cities ask judge to order Uber and Lyft to comply with AB5
By Jessica Mach
Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation
Government action won’t derail class action against Uber
By Winston Cho
Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation
State can’t pursue claim for gig drivers, motions say
By Jessica Mach
Labor/Employment
San Francisco DA sues DoorDash over driver classification
By Jessica Mach
Labor/Employment
Public Utilities Commission confirms Uber and Lyft drivers are employees, not independent contractors
By Jessica Mach
Civil Litigation
Greenberg Gross and client splitting in the midst of trade secrets trial against Uber
By Craig Anderson
Civil Litigation
Uber allowed to arbitrate drivers’ sick pay class action
By Winston Cho
