This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Aug. 7, 2020

Judge will issue decision soon on enforcement of state gig law

State advocates and lawyers for Uber and Lyft butted heads Thursday when they argued whether a superior court should issue a preliminary injunction requiring the companies to comply with Assembly Bill 5, but all parties agreed on one point: The court's decision would have far-reaching consequences.

State advocates and lawyers for Uber and Lyft butted heads Thursday when they argued whether a superior court should issue a preliminary injunction requiring the companies to comply with Assembly Bill 5, but all parties agreed on one point: The court's decision would have far-reaching consequences.

"We've looked. There's no case in California, there's no case anywhere where. ... The court has ordered hundreds of thousands of people ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up