The trial of a Russian convicted of hacking major Silicon Valley technology companies was plagued by prejudicial testimony from the prosecutors' primary witness and evidence from an unreliable source intended to frame the defendant, defense lawyers argued in a motion seeking acquittal or a new trial.
"The jury could only have found [Yevgeniy] Nikulin guilty of these crimes by use of conjecture and speculation, not facts," attorney ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In