Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Aug. 31, 2020
Becerra asks full 9th Circuit to rehear gun ammunition case
A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled California's ban is unconstitutional, but the state says that conflicts with case law.
Attorney General Xavier Becerra asked for a full panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review of its ruling that California's ban on the acquisition and possession of large-capacity gun magazines is unconstitutional, arguing in a motion Friday the decision conflicts with existing case law.
Plaintiffs backed by the California Rifle & Pistol Association sued in 2017 challenging Proposition 63, the 2016 law that made it ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Duncan v. Becerra
California's statewide ban on possession of large capacity magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition, substantially burdened core Second Amendment rights.
Civil Rights
Fyock v. City of Sunnyvale
City of Sunnyvale may restrict possession of large capacity firearm magazines.