Labor/Employment,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Sep. 14, 2020
9th Circuit upholds labor board’s action against union, over bipartisan dissents
Six judges dissented from the rejection of review, arguing a three-judge panel got it wrong when concluding the union violated the National Labor Relations Act by putting up flyers, sending text messages and speaking with employees of Commercial Metals Company, encouraging them to strike or stop work to support its wage dispute with Western Concrete Pumping.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday denied en banc review sought by a San Diego-based iron workers' union that lost a decision by the National Labor Relations Board saying it cannot encourage employees of a neutral employer to back its fight with another company.
Six judges dissented from the rejection of review, arguing a three-judge panel got it wrong when concluding the union violated the National Labor Relations Act ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
With Obama, Circuit Judge's Star Rises Again
