The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reconsidering its precedent against conditional reversals, vacating for now a decision granting a new trial to an inmate convicted of assault with a deadly weapon because the trial judge wrongly excluded expert testimony.
Precedent in the circuit holds the errors in allowing or excluding expert testimony requires a new trial. But 9th Circuit Judge $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In