U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 14, 2020
9th circuit conservatives dissent in takings case likely headed to high court
The appellate court majority affirmed a panel decision in the city's favor in a case involving whether a property owner who co-owned a residential building could move into one of the units if a lifetime lease was offered to the tenant.
A Fifth Amendment takings case may be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court after a large contingent of conservative judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dissented Tuesday from a ruling in a property owners' dispute with San Francisco.
The appellate court majority affirmed a panel decision in the city's favor in a case involving whether a property owner who co-owned a residential building could move into one of the units if ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Richard Seeborg
Constitutional Law
Knick v. Township of Scott
State-litigation requirement under 'Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City' imposes an unjustifiable burden on takings plaintiffs, conflicts with the ...