Labor/Employment
Nov. 2, 2020
Lyft cannot invoke arbitration agreement in state PAGA cases, appeals court rules
Lyft cannot enforce a provision in its arbitration agreement that bans drivers from bringing state Private Attorney General Act claims against the company, despite a U.S. Supreme Court opinion that allows for waivers banning collective actions, a three-justice state Court of Appeal panel ruled.
Lyft cannot enforce a provision in its arbitration agreement that bans drivers from bringing state Private Attorney General Act claims against the company, despite a U.S. Supreme Court opinion that allows for waivers banning collective actions, a three-justice state Court of Appeal panel ruled.
The U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Epic Systems Corporatio...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Arbitration
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
Federal Arbitration Act trumps savings clause and National Labor Relations Act, requiring enforcement of arbitration agreements, including terms requiring individualized proceedings.
Employment Law
Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC
Arbitration agreement that compels waiver of representative actions under Private Attorneys General Act is unenforceable as a matter of public policy.
