U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law
Jan. 5, 2021
Public health versus religious liberty
Since Justice Amy Coney Barrett replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the U.S. Supreme Court has sharply intensified its review of COVID-19 public health orders alleged to violate the free exercise clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Since Justice Amy Coney Barrett replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the U.S. Supreme Court has sharply intensified its review of COVID-19 public health orders alleged to violate the free exercise clause of the U.S. Constitution. Championing this development, Justice Neil Gorsuch has broadly condemned "a particular judicial impulse to stay out of the way in times of crisis." Yet neither Justice Gorsuch nor a majority of his colleagues have stepped forward to insist t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In