This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary,
Government,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

May 13, 2021

Judicial Council meeting on judicial bias disappoints attorneys

Some lawyers say the public meeting failed to give those listening in a substantive update on the findings and accomplishments of the work group, which has held five closed meetings since December and did not allow members of the public to speak at the public meeting.

Judicial Council meeting on judicial bias disappoints attorneys
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye

For attorneys hoping to improve how the California courts deal with judicial bias, the first public meeting a Judicial Council work group held last week was largely a letdown.

These attorneys say the public meeting failed to give those listening in a substantive update on the findings and accomplishments of the work group, which has held five closed meetings since December and did not allow members of the public to speak at the publi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up