Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Jun. 18, 2021
Questions linger after state high court upholds ‘California Rule’
The opinion permitted the California Legislature to address perceived pension abuses, even if the modification reduces some employee benefits, while upholding the requirement of the California Rule that detrimental changes otherwise must be accompanied by offsetting new advantages.
David E. Mastagni
Partner
Mastagni Holstedt APC
1912 I Street
Sacramento , CA 95811
Phone: 916-446-4692
Email: davidm@mastagni.com
Last year, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling on the "California Rule" in Alameda County Deputy Sheriffs' Association, et al. v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement System, et al., 9 Cal. 5th 1032 (2020). The opinion permitted the California Legislature to address perceived pension...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In