Appellate Practice
Aug. 19, 2021
Brief says appellate attorneys fear objecting to delays
Because appellants’ attorneys aren’t objecting, public interest gives him standing to challenge alleged slow decision-making by the 3rd District Court of Appeal, wrote appellate attorney Jon B. Eisenberg.
In a brief filed Wednesday, appellate attorney Jon B. Eisenberg argued he has standing to sue the 3rd District Court of Appeal over delays in issuing criminal decisions because attorneys representing parties in those cases might feel pressured to stay quiet for fear of losing work.
"The challenge to petitioner's standing fails because petitioner has public interest standing, by which a writ of mandate lies -- despite petitioner's lack of ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In