This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
Civil Litigation

Aug. 24, 2021

Opinion that Prop 22 is unconstitutional to be appealed

“The trial court judge has refused to acknowledge that the voters have coequal authority as the Legislature,” said Kurt R. Oneto with Nielsen Merksamer LLP.

Opinion that Prop 22 is unconstitutional to be appealed
Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch

Attorneys for ride-hailing companies said Monday that an Alameda County judge got it wrong when he ruled Proposition 22 -- which prevents gig drivers workers from being considered employees -- is unconstitutional.

If upheld, Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch's Friday afternoon ruling would toss out the initiative -- backed by Uber Technologies Inc., Lyft Inc., and DoorDash Inc. in a big-money campaign that passed in November 2020 with 58% o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up