California Supreme Court,
Appellate Practice
Sep. 8, 2021
3rd District trades filings with opposition in case over delays
“The ACLU asserts that petitioner’s public interest standing is ‘evident’ but omits to mention this court’s controlling authority that holds the exact opposite,” Raymond A. Cardozo, a partner with Reed Smith LLP in San Francisco representing the 3rd District Court of Appeal, wrote in a letter dated Sept. 2.
The attorney for the 3rd District Court of Appeals has made a fresh attack on the standing argument for an appellate attorney suing the court, stating that an ACLU amicus curiae letter misstates a state Supreme Court's opinion.
Meanwhile, writ petitioner Jon B. Eisenberg, an appellate attorney in Healdsburg, said the appellate court's delays in criminal cases are hurting crime victims as well as defendants.
In a...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In