Land Use,
Civil Litigation
Feb. 4, 2022
4th District publishes 2018 ruling on affordable housing development
Developers wanted it published so they could use it in other legal challenges, specifically a project the city of Encinitas is trying to block.
Acting on a request from organizations for developers, the 4th District Court of Appeal has published a ruling from 2018 that found a state law aimed at forcing cities to allow the construction of more affordable housing trumps local control.
The case involved approval for the development of the 6th & Olive Project, a 20-story mixed-use building with 204 dwelling units in the Bankers Hill neighborhood near downtown San Diego.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Real Property
Bankers Hill 150 v. City of San Diego
A city did not abuse its discretion in approving a development project because the city was obligated to approve the project under the Density Bonus Law.
Real Property
Wollmer v. City of Berkeley (1950 MLK LLC)
Under Density Bonus Law, project's base number is calculated exclusive of units authorized by mandatory or discretionary density bonuses.
