This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
California Courts of Appeal

May 11, 2022

Panel mulls caste argument for anonymity

“This is an unusual case where proceeding anonymously is necessary to protect the safety of Doe and his family and to further the public interest in the ... enforcement of civil rights laws,” stated Michelle Lee, counsel for the state and a partner at Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff and Lowe LLP.

Outside counsel for the state and Cisco battled in oral arguments Tuesday before the 6th District Court of Appeal over whether a whistleblower, who called attention to caste discrimination in Silicon Valley, should remain anonymous because he fears retaliation for his caste identity as an “untouchable.”

Michelle Lee, counsel for the state and a partner at Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff and Lowe LLP, and David Axelrad, partner at Horvitz & Levy LL...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up