Government,
Civil Rights,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
May 19, 2022
Attorney General Rob Bonta disagrees with 9th Circuit gun rights opinion
“Because the law imposes no meaningful burden on conduct protected by the Second Amendment, and because the law directly advances California’s interest in addressing firearm-related crime, suicide, and accidents, Plaintiffs’ claim fail under the matter of law,” Attorney General Rob Bonta stated in the response.
Fighting for dismissal of a suit challenging the law that allows him to share gun owners’ private information with a nonstate research group, Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a response in federal court in San Diego saying the plaintiffs — and the 9th Circuit opinion they quote as supplemental authority — are wrong.
“The 9th Circuit reversed the district court for applying intermediate scrutiny instead of strict scrutiny,” Bonta argued in t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In