Andy Warhol’s estate urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found the artist’s work does not constitute fair use under the Copyright Act, arguing it contradicts 9th Circuit case law and would stifle creativity and upend copyright law.
“This case gives the court an opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to free artistic expression,” said Roman Martinez, a partner with Latham & Watkins LLP...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In