Labor/Employment,
Constitutional Law
Jul. 22, 2022
Well, that didn’t take long - 35 days later and Viking may be irrelevant
The opinion did not end up being the panacea for defendants that was touted.
Eric B. Kingsley
Partner
Kingsley & Kingsley APC
Labor & Employment
16133 Ventura Blvd #1200
Encino , CA 91436
Phone: (818) 990-8300
Fax: (818) 990-2903
Email: eric@kingsleylawyers.com
Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA
Eric is the former board chair of the Anti-Defamation League's Los Angeles Region.
On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court granted review in Adolph v. Uber, ostensibly for the purpose of clarifying PAGA standing requirements under California Law. This has serious ramifications on the core holding in Viking.
A few weeks ago, on June 15th, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Viking River Cruises Inc. v. Moriana, 20-1573 (S. Ct., filed May 10, 2021). Many in the wage & hour bar believed that Viking...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In