When I attended law school, I learned that the rule of law is based on facts, not opinions. Unfortunately, the authors who recently submitted their Op Ed arguing against offering an alternative "Pathway to Licensure" in California have based their comments on their own opinions, misrepresentation of facts and personal gains.
The authors identify six reasons they oppose non-exam options. Each explanation is based not on actual experience or ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In