This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary,
Intellectual Property,
Civil Litigation

Aug. 10, 2022

‘I played the game. Why didn’t you?’ judge asks, tossing copyright case

“Plaintiff’s counsel could have easily verified these facts prior to filing the factually baseless complaint, just as the court easily verified them within the first hour and a half of playing the game,” U.S. District Court Judge Todd W. Robinson wrote.

Call of Duty video games are not based on the copyrighted materials and likeness of a San Diego man and the plaintiff’s lawyers would have known that if they had bothered to play the game, wrote a federal judge before dismissing the case.

“Plaintiff’s counsel could have easily verified these facts prior to filing the factually baseless complaint, just as the court easily verified them within the first hour and a half of playing the game,”...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up