An adverse judgment for an unfulfilled settlement cannot be vacated if the parties recognize the amount as damages in the agreement, a unanimous appellate panel ruled.
The 2nd District Court of Appeal ruling came last month in the case of a Ventura County man who inadvertently admitted owing rent monies by signing a settlement to close a dispute. The panel said that the man’s “financial wound was self-inflicted” because he failed to fulfi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In