Contracts
Sep. 12, 2022
California court excuses performance of COVID-impacted contract
The court’s decision is consistent with California precedent, which long ago merged the common law doctrines of impracticability and impossibility.
Dariush Adli
President
ADLI Law Group
444 S Flower St
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Email: adli@adlilaw.com
Univ of Michigan Law Sch; Ann Arbor MI
A recent California Superior Court decision confirms the viability of the defense of impossibility or impracticability to performance of certain COVID-19 impacted contracts.
In Balboa Capital Corporation v. Ederra Plastic Surgery, PC. Case No. 30-2020-01144747-CU-CL-NJC, decided on Sept. 1, plaintiff was a national equipment financing company, which had financed a laser induced fat reduction device purchased by the defendant, a plas...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In