Technology,
Labor/Employment
Sep. 21, 2022
Uber: Under Viking River plaintiff has no PAGA standing
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Theane Evangelis argued that the plaintiff cannot represent other workers in a PAGA case arguing that Uber misclassified employees as independent contractors because his own lawsuit was referred to arbitration.
Attorneys for Uber Technologies Inc. told the state Supreme Court that a plaintiff who filed a Private Attorneys General Act claim on behalf of his co-workers does not have standing to do so in light of a June U.S. high court decision.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP partner Theane Evangelis, in an opening brief filed Monday, argued that Erik Adolph cannot represent other workers in a PAGA case arguing that Uber misclassified employees as ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In