This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Oct. 10, 2022

Uber, Lyft await appeal of compelled arbitration denial

This complex litigation matter represents a group of cases filed by individuals, three city attorneys — from Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco — as well the state of California. At the heart of each case is the allegation by the plaintiffs that Uber and Lyft’s business model of bringing on drivers as independent contractors rather than direct employees violates the drivers’ employment rights and state labor law.

While their attempt to compel arbitration is on appeal, Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. appeared for a pretrial hearing in a lawsuit brought by the state and three city attorneys alleging the companies misclassified drivers as independent contractors.

Friday’s proceeding comes just days after the companies’ filed an appeal of San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman’s denial of their attempt to compel arbitration.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up