This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Technology

Oct. 14, 2022

Class asks that Facebook tracking case proceed with lead plaintiff

The underlying dispute arose from the plaintiffs’ allegations that Facebook’s tracking pixel was being used to monitor their online movement off the internet and requesting personally identifiable information about the plaintiffs from other servers such as HBO and its streaming platform HBO Max.

The plaintiffs in a proposed class action against Meta Platforms Inc. and Facebook Inc., who alleged that the social media companies violated the Federal Wiretap Act of 1968 by monitoring their activity on the streaming app HBO Max and CNN, told a Santa Clara County judge that the case should proceed without one lead plaintiff.

According to a preconference statement by the plaintiffs’ lead counsel — L. Timothy Fisher and Scott A. Bursor o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up