Land Use,
Judges and Judiciary,
Government
Nov. 4, 2022
LA judge granted more than protesters asked, reversing panel says
“The trial court had discretion to tailor relief to redress harm to respondents,” the panel ruled. “It did not, however, have license to order preliminary injunctive relief that went far astray from the expressive activity requested by respondents, the only activity for which The Grove denied permission.”
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge erred in granting protesters against mayoral candidate Rick Caruso demonstration rights at the outdoor mall he owns, according to an appeal court panel which unanimously held that the lower court’s ruling granted the protesters rights different from those which they had sought in their lawsuit.
“Importantly, for purposes of the trial court’s consideration of their preliminary injunction motion, the plaint...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In