Litigation & Arbitration
Nov. 28, 2022
‘Vexatious’ litigant files again, Starbucks demands sanction
The plaintiff — Peter Strojnik — had been deemed a vexatious litigation by the Northern District of California and Santa Clara County Superior Courts, and thus, was barred from filing, without permission, the new complaint over disabled accommodations.
‘Vexatious’ litigant files again, Starbucks demands sanction
On the grounds the plaintiff has been barred from filing claims because a previous federal judge found him to be a vexatious litigant, Starbucks has asked U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer to sanction him and dismiss his lawsuit claiming the company’s architectural designs discriminate against the disabled.
The plaintiff — Peter Strojnik — had been de...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In