Technology,
Litigation & Arbitration,
Class Action
Dec. 30, 2022
Class opposes arbitration in suit over Tesla Autopilot
Tesla’s counsel — David C. Marcus of WilmerHale in Los Angeles — argued that the plaintiffs purchased the vehicles knowing the limitations of the Autopilot feature and that the arbitration clause is binding.
A class of plaintiffs who accused Tesla, Inc. of fraudulently marketing its vehicles’ Autopilot feature are opposing compelled arbitration in a brief that claims the electric automaker made consumers “empty promises.”
Counsel for the plaintiffs filed the brief Wednesday to oppose Tesla’s motion to compel arbitration for four of the five plaintiffs’ claims. One of the plaintiffs opted out of the arbitration clause that comes as standard in ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In