A federal judge overseeing a $116 million trial against TikTok in Los Angeles grew frustrated with one of the plaintiff’s attorneys Thursday for not laying what he felt was enough foundation in the attorney’s questioning of a witness.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo PC partner Andrew D. Skale explained to U.S. District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. during a recess that his client could not find any other explanation for why...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In