This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

State Bar & Bar Associations

Mar. 6, 2023

Attorneys slam proposed 'snitch rule' as divisive

In response to criticisms of the rule’s vagueness, members of the committee struggled to reach a general consensus as they continued to make revisions to the proposed Rule 8.3 of the rules of Professional Conduct throughout the hearing.

Multiple attorneys, who mostly remained anonymous in written public comments, criticized a proposed State Bar requirement to report misconduct by their colleagues as leading to compelled speech, decreased civility in the profession and further alienation between the bar and California’s lawyers.

The submissions to the State Bar Committee on Professional Responsibility for its public discussion Friday also suggested there would be confusion ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up