Civil Litigation
Mar. 6, 2023
Agreement on terminology moves forward Carson fire case
Originally set to be delivered to the court in February, the fact sheet was delayed at the last minute when plaintiffs' counsel took issue with language suggested by the defense allowing for the dismissal of plaintiffs who do not complete the questionnaire substantially.
Attorneys in a case stemming from a warehouse fire and persistent odor in Carson argued about what constitutes a “substantially complete” plaintiff’s fact sheet and agreed on Thursday to compromise to move forward the litigation involving 19,000 individual claims.
Originally set to be delivered to the court in February, the fact sheet was delayed at the last minute when plaintiffs’ counsel took issue with language suggested by the defense ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In